Connect with us

Technology

iPhone 13 vs iPhone 12: Apple’s latest phones compared

Published

on

California News Times

Apple’s new iPhone 13 range is filled with upgrades across the range, composed of iPhone 13 Mini, iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max New phones display a new camera system, a modified design with a smaller notch, longer battery life and one variety of colors. And the whole The iPhone 13 lineup starts with 128 GB of storage, which means the phone will likely have plenty of space for your photos, apps, music and so on for the price of $ 729 (£ 679, AU $ 1,199) for the Mini and $ 829 (£ 779, 1 AU $ 349) for the base iPhone 13 Although if you wanted to level up, now you can get a iPhone 13 Pro with up to 1TB storage.

Meanwhile, the IPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Mini aren’t going anywhere. Prices for both phones have come down, so they now start at $ 599 for the 64GB iPhone 12 Mini and $ 699 for the 64GB iPhone 12. If you can settle for less storage space, then the IPhone 12 models are still great phones which run very fast, support 5G, and are powered by Apple’s A14 Bionic chip. The iPhone 12 Pro and 12 Pro Max, however, were dropped to make way for the 13 Pro and 13 Pro Max.

Read more: CNET iPhone 13, 13 Mini, 13 Pro and 13 Pro Max Reviews

Let’s go over some key differences between Line 13 and Line 12, to help determine whether you might want to go for a 2021 iPhone or stick with a 2020 iPhone.

Price

At first glance, the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Mini’s starting prices are $ 100 cheaper than the corresponding iPhone 13 models, but that’s before you factor in storage space. Both iPhone 12 models start at 64GB, which several years ago was a lot of space. Now, with bigger and bigger apps and cameras taking even more detailed photos with videos, you might run into that storage limit during your time with the phone. The iPhone 13 starts at 128GB, so if you compare that with a 128GB iPhone 12, you now only see a price difference of $ 50.

For that $ 50 difference, you get what you pay for by opting for the iPhone 13, which we’ll get to in the following sections. But if all you want is a 5G iPhone and you’re unlikely to install a ton of apps on it, the iPhone 12 is indeed cheaper while still retaining most of the same features as the iPhone 12. ‘iPhone 13.

Battery life

While we are still performing battery tests on the iPhone 13 lineup, the initial statistics provided by Apple are quite promising. IPhone 13 is expected to run 2.5 hours longer than iPhone 12, while iPhone 13 Mini is expected to run 1.5 hours longer than 12 Mini. In CNET editor Patrick Holland IPhone 13 and 13 Mini review, he notes that the two phones easily get through a day on a single charge. This was especially noticeable since his personal iPhone 12 Mini typically requires a 3pm charge to get through the day.

A15 Bionic vs. A14 Bionic

For most tasks, the A14 Bionic and A15 Bionic chips will likely both handle your FaceTime calls, texts, apps, games, and streaming videos with little noticeable difference. However, the iPhone 13’s A15 Bionic may already be designed to be compatible with new devices and software being developed by Apple. Recent reports suggest that Apple could work on an augmented reality and VR headset which could use iPhone 13 and future iPhone models as a host device.

Currently, the iPhone 13 chip powers the Cinematic video recording mode on 2021 phones. In this mode, the phone can automatically focus on subjects as they enter the frame while not focusing on others, giving your videos a cinematic look. These videos can also be edited after the fact if you want more control over who is in focus.

Cameras

The camera specs for iPhone 13 and iPhone 12 are the same. Both phones include 12-megapixel sensors on the front and rear cameras. But that doesn’t say everything about the differences in photo processing between phones.

On the iPhone 13, the new camera layout gives the wide-angle camera a larger sensor with sensor-based stabilization. The iPhone 13’s new diagonal camera layout allows this sensor to be larger, while the new ultra-wide camera sensor helps it collect more light. On the software side, the iPhone 13 also includes Photographic Styles, which let you customize the way your camera develops your photos. These styles are not like Instagram filters, as they analyze the subject of your photo and apply the selected style as needed.

That said, the iPhone 12’s cameras still aren’t left out, including many of the same improvements offered by iOS 15. In our review, Holland notes that the iPhone’s camera upgrades 13 do not make drastic differences, but the improvements between the models from year to year have been noticeable.

Specification vs. specification

Check out the table below comparing the iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Mini, iPhone 12, and iPhone 12 Mini to see a spec-by-spec comparison among the non-Pro iPhones currently available. Let us know in the comments if you’d rather save money with the iPhone 12, jump in with a new iPhone 13, or if your current iPhone is still the best for all of your everyday needs.

iPhone 13 Mini and 13 vs. iPhone 12 Mini and 12

iPhone 12 Mini iPhone 13 Mini iPhone 12 iPhone 13
Display size, resolution 6.1 inch OLED; 2.532 × 1.170 pixels 5.4 inch OLED; 2,340 × 1,080 pixels 5.4 inch OLED; 2,340 × 1,080 pixels 6.1 inch OLED; 2.532 × 1.170 pixels
Pixel density 460ppi 476ppi 476ppi 460ppi
Dimensions (inch) 5.78 × 2.82 × 0.29 inch 5.18 × 2.53 × 0.3 inch 5.18 × 2.53 × 0.29 inch 5.78 × 2.82 × 0.3 inch
Dimensions (mm) 146.7 × 71.5 × 7.4mm 132x64x7.65mm 131.5 × 64.2 × 7.4mm 147x72x7.65mm
Weight (ounces, grams) 5.78 ounces; 164g 4.97 ounces; 141g 4.76 ounces; 135g 6.14 ounces; 174g
Mobile software iOS 14 iOS 15 iOS 14 iOS 15
Camera 12 megapixels (wide), 12 megapixels (ultrawide) 12 megapixels (wide), 12 megapixels (ultrawide) 12 megapixels (wide), 12 megapixels (ultrawide) 12 megapixels (wide), 12 megapixels (ultrawide)
Front facing the camera 12 megapixels 12 megapixels 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Video capture 4K HDR video recording with Dolby Vision up to 4K at 60 fps 4K HDR video recording with Dolby Vision up to 4K at 60 fps
Processor Bionic Apple 14 Apple A15 Bionic Apple A14 Bionic Apple A15 Bionic
Storage room 64 GB, 128 GB, 256 GB 128 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB 64 GB, 128 GB, 256 GB 128 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB
RAM not disclosed not disclosed not disclosed not disclosed
Expandable storage No No No No
Drums Not disclosed; Apple lists 15 hours of video playback Not disclosed; Apple lists 17 hours of video playback Not disclosed; Apple lists 15 hours of video playback Not disclosed; Apple lists 19 hours of video playback
Fingerprint detector No (facial identification) No (facial identification) No (facial identification) No (facial identification)
Connector Flash Flash Flash Flash
Headphone socket No No No No
Particularities 5G enabled; MagSafe; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging; dual-SIM capabilities (nano-SIM and e-SIM) 5G enabled; MagSafe; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging; dual-SIM capabilities (nano-SIM and e-SIM) 5G enabled; MagSafe; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging; dual-SIM capabilities (nano-SIM and e-SIM) 5G enabled; MagSafe; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging; dual-SIM capabilities (nano-SIM and e-SIM)
Price out of contract (USD) $ 629 (64GB), $ 679 (128GB), $ 779 (256GB) $ 729 (128GB), $ 829 (256GB), $ 1,029 (512GB) $ 729 (64GB), $ 779 (128GB), $ 879 (256GB) $ 829 (128GB), $ 929 (256GB), $ 1,129 (512GB)
Price (GBP) £ 799 (64GB), £ 849 (128GB), £ 949 (256GB) £ 679 (128GB), £ 779 (256GB), £ 979 (512GB) £ 699 (64GB), £ 749 (128GB), £ 849 (256GB) £ 779 (128GB), £ 879 (256GB), £ 1,079 (512GB)
Price (AUD) AU $ 1,349 (64 GB), AU $ 1,429 (128 GB), AU $ 1,599 (256 GB) AU $ 1,199 (128 GB), AU $ 1,369 (256 GB), AU $ 1,719 (512 GB) AU $ 1,199 (64 GB), AU $ 1,279 (128 GB), AU $ 1,449 (256 GB) AU $ 1,349 (128 GB), AU $ 1,519 (256 GB), AU $ 1,869 (512 GB)


Now playing:
Check this out:

Apple announces the new iPhone 13 range, the Apple Watch series…



1:49

iPhone 13 vs iPhone 12: Comparison of Latest Apple Phones Source Link iPhone 13 vs iPhone 12: Comparison of Latest Apple Phones

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Artificial intelligence is smart, but doesn’t it work well with others

Published

on

California News Times

Studies have shown that humans find AI to be a frustrating teammate when playing cooperative games together and a challenge for “team intelligence”.

When it comes to games like chess and go, Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs far outperform the best players in the world. These “superhuman” AIs are unmatched competitors, but perhaps more difficult than competing with humans is to work with them. Can the same technology get along with people?

In a new study MIT Lincoln Laboratory researchers use advanced AI models that are well trained to play with teammates they have never met before, and how humans play collaborative card games fireworks. I looked for what I could do. In the single-blind experiment, participants played two sets of games. One used an AI agent as a teammate and the other used a rules-based agent, a bot manually programmed to play in a predefined way.

The results surprised the researchers. Not only did AI teammates perform worse than rule-based agents, humans have always hated playing with AI teammates. They found him to be unpredictable, unreliable, unreliable and felt negative even when the team gave a good score. An article detailing this study was accepted by the 2021 Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) Conference.

Fireworks experience

When playing the “Fireworks” cooperative card game, humans were dissatisfied and confused by the movements of their AI teammates. Credit: Bryan Mastergeorge

“This highlights the subtle difference between creating an AI that works objectively well and creating an AI that is subjectively reliable or prioritized,” the article co-wrote. Said Ross Allen, researcher in the artificial intelligence technology group. “They’re so close to each other that they can appear to be out of the sun, but this study showed that they’re actually two separate issues. We have to work to untangle them. “

Humans who dislike AI teammates may worry researchers who design this technology in collaboration with humans about real-world challenges such as missile protection and performing complex surgeries. This dynamic, called team intelligence, is the next frontier in AI research and uses a specific type of AI called reinforcement learning.

Reinforcement learning The AI ​​is not informed of the action to be taken, but by experimenting with the scenario several times, it discovers which action provides the most digital “reward”. It is this technology that has created superhuman chess and go players. Unlike rule-based algorithms, these AIs are not programmed to follow “if / then” instructions. This is because the results of human tasks you plan to work on, such as driving a car, are too high to be coded.

“Reinforcement learning is a much more versatile way to develop AI. If you can train him to learn to play chess, that agent isn’t necessarily going to drive a car. But with the right data, you can use the same algorithm to train another officer to drive a car, ”says Allen. “Theoretically, the sky is the limit of what it can do.”

Bad advice, bad game

Today, researchers are testing the performance of reinforcement learning models developed for collaboration in the same way that chess has served as a benchmark for testing competitive AI for decades. I use fireworks to do this.

The fireworks game is similar to the multiplayer format of Solitaire. Players work together to stack cards of the same suit in order. However, players cannot see their cards, only cards held by their teammates. Each player has severe restrictions on what can be communicated to their teammates, allowing them to choose the best card in their hand and then crush it.

Lincoln Laboratory researchers did not develop the AI ​​or the rules-based agent used in this experiment. Both agents are the best in their respective fields of fireworks performance. real, the AI ​​model was previously paired with an AI teammate who never played with them, the team achieved the highest score ever in a fireworks display between two unknown AI agents .

“It was a big result,” says Allen. “I thought if these AIs that I had never met before could come together and play really well, I should be able to bring in people who know how to play AI as well. They are also doing very well. That’s why I thought the AI ​​team could play well objectively, and I thought humans like it because, in general, if it works, they like things better. “

None of these expectations were met. Objectively, there was no statistical difference in scores between AI and rule-based agents. Subjectively, all 29 participants reported a clear preference for rule-based teammates in the survey. Participants were not told which agent and what game they were playing.

“One participant said he actually had a headache because he was stressed out by the AI ​​agent’s bad game,” said Jaimepena, researcher and author of the AI ​​Technology and Group article. Systems. “Another said rule-based agents thought they were ridiculous but achievable, but AI agents showed they understood the rules, but the movement was the look of the team. didn’t fit. For them, it gave a bad clue and played badly. “

Inhuman creativity

This perception that AI is “playing badly” is linked to the surprising behavior previously observed in reinforcement learning tasks. For example, when DeepMind’s AlphaGo first beat one of the best Go players in the world in 2016, one of the most admired moves made by AlphaGo was move 37 in game 2 An Unusual Move That The Human commentators thought it was a mistake. Subsequent analysis revealed that this move was actually very well calculated and described as a “genius”.

Such moves can be praised when performed by an AI opponent, but less likely to be celebrated in a team setting. Researchers at the Lincoln Laboratory have discovered that weird or seemingly illogical moves are the worst criminals for breaking human trust in the AI ​​teammates of these tightly coupled teams. Such movements not only reduce the player’s perception of how the player and their AI teammates work together, but also the amount of AI used, especially when the potential rewards are not immediately apparent. I also lowered what I wanted to do.

“There have been a lot of comments about giving up, like ‘I hate to handle this’,” said Hosea Siu, author of the article and researcher in the Autonomy and Control Systems Engineering group. Add.

Participants who rated themselves as fireworks experts, led by the majority of players in this survey, often abandoned AI players. Siu sees this as a concern for AI developers, as the main users of this technology are likely experts in the field.

“Let’s say you train a super intelligent AI guidance assistant for a missile defense scenario. You don’t give it to an intern. You give it to your expert on your ship who has been doing this for 25 years. Therefore, if there is a strong expert bias against it in the game scenario, it can manifest itself in actual operations, ”he adds.

Squeeze the human

The researchers say the AI ​​used in this study was not developed for human taste. But that’s part of the problem – not much. Like most collaborative AI models, this model is designed to score as high as possible, and its success is measured by its objective performance.

If the researchers don’t focus on the question of subjective human tastes, “you can’t create the AI ​​that humans really want to use,” says Allen. “It’s easier to work with AI which improves very sharp numbers. It is much more difficult to work on an AI that works in this favorite world of the humans of Musier. “

Solving this more difficult problem is the goal of the MeRLin (Mission-Ready Reinforcement Learning) project. The experiment was funded by the technical office of MIT Lincoln Laboratory in conjunction with the U.S. Air Force’s Artificial Intelligence Accelerator and MIT’s Electrical and Computer Engineering Division. Chemistry. This project investigates what keeps collaborative AI technology from leaping out of the play space and into more delicate reality.

Researchers believe that AI’s ability to explain its behavior builds trust. This will be the focus of their work next year.

“I can imagine we would repeat the experiment, but after the fact – and it’s not as easy as it looks – the humans said, ‘I don’t understand why you made that move. Did you do that? “If the AI ​​can give some insight into what they think is going to happen based on their behavior, our guess is that humans ‘oh, weird thought, but I get it now.’ Trust it. Even if you don’t change basic AI decisions, the results will change completely, “Allen says.

Like post-game chats, this type of exchange often helps humans form friendships and cooperate as a team.

“It may also be a staff prejudice. Most AI teams don’t want to tackle these squeaky people and their limp issues, ”Siu adds with a laugh. “People want to do math and optimization. This is the basis, but it is not enough.

Mastering fireworks-like games between AI and humans has the potential to open up a world of possibilities for teaming up with intelligence in the future. But the technology can remain mechanical or human until researchers can bridge the gap between AI performance and human taste.

Reference: Ho Chit Siu, Jaime D. Pena, Kimberlee C. Chang, Edenna Chen, Yutai Zhou, Victor J. Lopez, Kyle Palko, RossE “Human AI Team Assessment for Rule-Based Agents Learned to Hanabi “”. Allen, accepts, 2021 Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) Conference..
arXiv: 2107.07630

Artificial Intelligence Is Smart, But Doesn’t Work Well With Others Source Link Artificial Intelligence Is Smart, But Doesn’t Work Well With Others

Continue Reading

Technology

Ventures Platform and Hustle Fund back Nigerian fintech Brass in $ 1.7 million round – TechCrunch

Published

on

California News Times

SMEs represent over 95% of all Nigerian businesses. However, despite their size and importance, most of them are underserved by financial institutions and lack the full range of financial services needed to expand their operations.

Aside from complete financial needs including credit and small business Obligatory Other important resources to understand their financial operations.

Brass is a Nigerian fintech that addresses these challenges by providing banking services to small businesses. The company has secured $ 1.7 million in funding to expand its services to “local entrepreneurs, traders and fast growing businesses.”

Sora Akindle When Emmanuel Okeke Brass was created in July 2020. Before Brass, CEO Akindolu Kudi’s product manager, backed by YC, and CTO Okeke were CTO of Paystack, a Stripe subsidiary.

Akindle’s work at Kudi has focused on the issues facing SMEs in Nigeria...He said these companies pay sellers, transfer funds and Globally Company health.

But why start with brass when you have an existing product in the Nigerian market that can be used by small businesses and entrepreneurs? Shining For example, we offer both personal and business banking services (priority is given to the latter).. Neobank for carbon consumers When Hisada Has different stages of providing business functions to SMEs.. Pro Spa, a company supported by YC, I don’t want to think of myself as an online bank, so I also offer software and banking services to micro-businesses and the self-employed.

Akindolu believes that while these products have an entry point into the SME market, they do not meet the overall needs of banks in companies like Brass.

“There are a lot of ways that money can flow out of the business, like payroll, vendor payments, invoicing, and so on. We want to support the cash flow of a business. We support them in these areas and the money is flowing. We want to keep going and allow them to keep growing their business, ”Akindle said of Brass’s app. “That’s what we do most of the time in Brass today. We support our financial operations and our treasury... “

Brass was wrapped up in a professional bank account, which included credit and payment services, payroll and expense management, API support, cash flow analysis, team and contact management, point of sale. sales, debit cards, credit cards and other basic business services. We offer a series of products. ..

Among all these characteristics, Brass makes a big bet on the achievements of Brass Capital. This space is already heating up on other platforms such as: float Provides working capital and software services to businesses. That said, Brass Capital has seen great success in a short period of time. Cash Flow Finance Services claims that 20 Brass private beta clients paid more than $ 2 million in credit after using it for six months.

Akindolu told TechCrunch that the company will be opening the service to the public soon...

According to Brass, many customers use the platform as their default currency trading service provider... FinTech makes money by offering credits and API calls in its regular product offering, the CEO said...

From schools and shopping centers to restaurants and fintechs like Eden and Mono that use complete banking solutions, we have more than 5,000 customers. And youLike any other platform, Brass seeks to simultaneously optimize the platform for different levels of activity with different needs.

“What we’re trying to do is build a financial services stack. We may be overkill for small business. They may find us unnecessary, so I’m more interested in SMEs. “

According to founder and general partner Kola Aina, the mission of making banking services for SMEs work was one of the reasons pan-African venture capital firm Ventures Platform invested in the business.

Other investors include Flutterwave CEO Olugbenga “GB” Agboola, Paystack co-founder Ezra Olubi, the Hustle fund, Acuity Ventures and the hedged fund.

Previous supporters include Olumide Soyombo Capital Voltron, Leonard Stiegler and Fola Olatunji-David.

“we Excited Support the Sora and Brass teams, which provide important financial technology to businesses in Africa, including Nigeria In regards to “41.5 million businesses,” said Elizabeth Inn, general partner of Hustle Fund.

it’s not Nevertheless In Nigeria, access to full banking services remains one of the most important constraints for SMEs and is the largest economy in Africa. Indeed, the formal SME sector on the continent has an annual financing gap. $ 136 billion Although they represent over 80% of employed people.

For this reason, Akindolu has confirmed that Brass will use part of its funds to expand into Kenya and South Africa by next year (the former has been incorporated). Key to promoting expansion plans across Africa Flutterwave, the one-year-old company said in a statement. Brass also plans to diversify its customer base by launching more product categories, including a focus on credit. This market.

Ventures Platform, Hustle Fund back Nigerian fintech Brass in $ 1.7 million round – TechCrunch Source link Ventures Platform, Hustle Fund back Nigerian fintech Brass in $ 1.7 million round – TechCrunch

Continue Reading

Technology

Kitchenful meal planner startup raises $ 1.9 million from VentureFriends, Goodwater Capital and Jabbar – TechCrunch

Published

on

California News Times

With the pandemic making us delivery specialists, consumers have switched to in-car meal kits, given the combination of delivery and home cooking. However, many diet kits can be rigid.

German startup Kitchenful made this possible, allowing users to browse recipes from food bloggers and create personalized meal plans that can be tailored to their tastes and dietary needs. Another product from Kitchen Full is that it tries to be just as affordable. I wrote earlier this year ..

After successfully completing the Y-Combinator Summer 2021 program, we raised $ 1.9 million in fundraising from VentureFriends, Goodwater Capital and the Jabbar Internet Group.

Former investors include Y-Combinator, Valentin Stalf (co-founder and CEO of N26), Samih Toukan (co-founder of Souq), David Fischer (HighSnobiety), Maik Ludewig (DurstExpress MD) and Victor Henning. (Co-founder of Mendeley).

Co-founders Chris Schiller and Christian Hartung are currently planning to expand into the EU and North America.

Schiller previously spent four years as vice president of products at HelloFresh, and he and Hartung were previously on Rocket Internet.

Schiller said: “We believe that cooking at home should be simple, enjoyable and personal. But in today’s world, “what is dinner? Is always a nerve-racking and grocery question. Shopping takes the time and energy of millions of people every day. We are correcting this with new services and the ambition to become the # 1 home cooking brand in the United States and Europe. “

Apostolos Apostolakis, co-founder and partner of Venture Friends, said: With very relevant experience with its founder, Kitchenful is in a promising position to become a leading home cooking brand. “

Kitchen Full may encounter strong opposition from other new players in this Lollipop space etc …

Meal Planner Startup Kitchenful Raises $ 1.9 Million from VentureFriends, Goodwater Capital and Jabbar – TechCrunch Source Link Meal Planner Startup Kitchenful Raises $ 1.9 Million from VentureFriends, Goodwater Capital and Jabbar – TechCrunch

Continue Reading

Trending

Ad Blocker Detected!

Please Disable Adblocker to Continue, We are able to fund this blog only with the Ads Revenue, Thanks!

Refresh